Posted on

Putin Rings Down the Curtain on Democracy in Russia

Georgy Bovt, writing in the Moscow Times, explains how the Kremlin has utterly obliterated the last vestiges of democracy in Russia and rendered the country a nation of helpless, bleating sheep, just as in Soviet times. Welcome back to the USSR!

In the wake of protests in December and February, the authorities made concessions to the opposition by announcing a host of political reforms before the March presidential election. The law to ease the registration of new political parties, intended to liberalize the political process, was passed quickly. But every other amendment proposed by the opposition was ignored, including the two most important: the ability for parties to form coalitions prior to elections and the demand to lower the barrier for parties to gain seats in the State Duma. At present, that barrier stands at 5 percent, and voters who support the smaller parties risk not only having no representation in parliament, but also seeing their votes effectively awarded to the winning party. The result will be a major “Balkanization” process in which dozens of new parties are formed but are rendered useless.

Then there is the bill to return direct gubernatorial elections.

The bill was slapped together quickly after President Dmitry Medvedev expressed the need for a law on direct gubernatorial elections and President-elect Vladimir Putin remarked that it should include some form of presidential “filter” for culling out undesirable candidates. Then, the Kremlin came up with even more stringent filters — this time at the municipal level. Authorities have introduced a requirement that gubernatorial candidates from registered parties must collect signatures from 5 percent to 10 percent of municipal lawmakers and elected officials from municipal bodies.

But independent candidates have a tougher task. They must collect the signatures of 0.5 percent to 2 percent of the voters in their region. What’s more, those signatures cannot be collected from a single municipality where an opposition candidate might have a strong base, but from three-fourths of the municipalities in the region.

Lawmakers in the regions’ legislatures have the authority to decide which requirement to use — signatures of from 5 percent to 10 percent of municipal lawmakers or the signatures of from 0.5 percent to 2 percent of the region’s voters. The regional authorities know which approach will best eliminate undesirable candidates.

Regional legislatures also have the authority to rule on the validity of signatures. This is an old trick. It is very simple for the authorities to disqualify an unwanted candidate by refusing to recognize the legitimacy of individual signatures.

In contrast to their European and U.S. counterparts, Russian municipalities have practically no rights at all. They have almost no independent budget or tax base for funding municipal programs, and their authority is so severely limited that they remain completely at the mercy of governors and Moscow. If, for example, a mayor is elected who does not belong to the ruling party, his access to funding from the regional level can be easily shut off. Voters who are aware of this will be faced with the tough decision: Is it worth it to cross paths with United Russia and vote for an opposition candidate?

There are other ways to eliminate undesirable candidates. The authorities could suddenly “discover” that a candidate has a false college diploma or a mistake on his tax return. Thanks to strong ties between local politicians and a region’s powerful local businesspeople, the authorities have a wide variety of shady ways to bring pressure on undesirable candidates. For example, the regional prosecutor can threaten an opposition candidate or one of his relatives with criminal proceedings on trumped-up charges.

Given these strict municipal filters for gubernatorial elections, presidential filters are now largely unnecessary, although they remain in place just in case. For example, the president can call a meeting with any party or independent candidate and can voice his approval or disapproval at his own discretion. Formally, the president’s recommendations are not binding, but every self-seeking politician understands the benefits of pleasing the Kremlin.

There are, however, a few positive features in the bill. For example, the people can unseat unpopular governors through a referendum. But this requires a court ruling proving that the governor violated the law, signatures from 25 percent of the region’s population to initiate a referendum, and a vote of more than 50 percent in a referendum to remove a governor from office — a near impossible task in today’s Russia.

The bill also provides for gubernatorial elections in two rounds, although the initial plan was to make a relative majority of votes sufficient for election. In addition, no governor can be elected to more than two consecutive terms, although this rule does not apply to incumbent governors who can be elected to two more consecutive terms. But even here the Kremlin took no chances. Before the bill was passed, Medvedev quickly replaced more than a dozen governors in regions where United Russia fared poorly in the Duma and presidential elections.

The new legislation will prompt opposition parties to be more active at the municipal level. In the long term, this could be a positive development if political competition appears at the level that is most important for any democracy to develop — the grassroots. But to make this work, municipal bodies need to have more authority to form and control local spending budgets. That will require a prolonged struggle, the results of which will be evident only several years from now. The ruling elite are counting on those years to remain in power without having to rush into making any political reforms.

Read more: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/why-presidential-filters-are-no-longer-needed/457593.html#ixzz1t8kBvwo6
The Moscow Times

About these ads

11 responses to “Putin Rings Down the Curtain on Democracy in Russia

  1. Leon Lentz ⋅

    This site spreads Goebbels style propaganda, typical for the venal US media. The scurrilous article by Bovt ignores the fact that Russian populations grew in the last 3 years, is growing now, and the poverty has declined by a factor of 3 under Putin. On the other hand, US has adopted a number of laws (NDAA, “Patriot Act”) allowing an indefinite detention of American Citizens without a charge, has fascist “eminent domain laws”, experiences a total degradation of a of civil rights, its reputation tarnished by 200 years of either slavery or segregation and 30 mln killed in Indian genocide. This pathetic brainwashing site is just hiding the obvious: US aggression in the Middle East resulting in murder, rape and destruction of millions by the criminal psychotic and cowardly US Armed forces. Contrast the brutal suppression by the US of OWS movement with the restrained actions of Russian police against US organized “Bolotnaya” demonstrations. I lived in US for 35 years and visit Russia every Summer. There is no comparison between oppressive, decaying, racist and fascist police state such as US where they can throw you out of any hospital onto the street pavement when your insurance runs out, and democratic, green and successfully dynamic, cultural, breathtakingly beautiful Russia. The low brow America’s university degrees don’t even measure up against Russia’s High School diplomas. The prospects of US as a concrete jungle, with ugly, overweight, brutal, decaying, two digit IQ population and its government idiocracy, are pitiful against the future of dynamic, intellectual, beautiful Russia.

    • larussophobe ⋅

      Umm, OK, but you do realize this article was taken entirely from the Moscow Times, one of the most respected sources of information about Russia that there is, right?

      • mingthemerciless ⋅

        Joe Goebbels was a National-Socialist, just like Vlad Stalinovich Putin, the Impaler…

        • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

          Thesis refuted: National Socialism is hardcore Western Supremacy — to wit, pure imbecility and depravity. Most notably, Nazi Germany sought to emulate Anglo-American imperialist barbarism and chauvinism, but the Soviets turned out to be way stronger. Clearly, Putin is no National Socialist, but a most honourable Russian Nationalist. La Russophobe, for its part, regurgitates fascist tripe as one would expect from mindless Western filth; take that.

          • mingthemerciless ⋅

            Face reality, Fred Dickhead, Chinless Stalinovich is, as you just said, a nationalist, and he has always been and will always be a Bolshevik sordid hitman, thus he is as much as nazi as faggot Ernst Roehm, who was a Bolchevik at heart, quote:
            “Adolf is a swine. He will give us all away. He only associates with reactionaries now. His old friends aren’t good enough for him. Getting matey with the East Prussian generals. They’re his cronies now. Adolf is turning into a gentleman. He’s got himself a tail-coat now. Adolf knows exactly what I want. I’ve told him often enough. Not a second edition of the old imperial army. Are we revolutionaries or aren’t we? Allons, enfants de la patrie! If we are, then something new must arise out of our élan, like the mass armies of the French Revolution. If we’re not, then we’ll go to the dogs. We’ve got to produce something new, don’t you see? A new discipline. A new principle of organization. The generals are a lot of old fogeys. They never had a new idea. ”

            PURE PUTIN!!!

          • Blablabla. Western drivel; void and trivial. Counts for less than nothing.

            It’s pretty amusing to see how hardcore Super Duper Westerners such as yourself even cannot dispense with the most obnoxious, silly habits of any average fascist rabble: that of raging and fuming. Is throwing tantrums your proud interpretation of the proverbial “discreet charm of the bourgeoisie” ?

  2. mingthemerciless ⋅

    [quote]The low brow America’s university degrees don’t even measure up against Russia’s High School diplomas. The prospects of US as a concrete jungle, with ugly, overweight, brutal, decaying, two digit IQ population and its government idiocracy, are pitiful against the future of dynamic, intellectual, beautiful Russia.[/quote]

    You are talking about Obama’s America, the bolchevik black nation of vampiric welfare parasites who fill 90% of the jail population
    and who, at 98%, dont know the name of their fathers…from the congo’s jungles to the concrete jungles…by the way, Russians ALL behave like a bunch of Ku Klux Klan goons with their minorities, I hear!

  3. mingthemerciless ⋅

    You dont build a country with a population that die at 49 with emphysema from chain smoking and cirrhosis of the liver from drinking two quarts of vodka a day…I see Manfred Softdick is already passed out drunk!

Talk back to La Russophobe

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s