Posted on

Shame and Disgrace for Sharapova at London 2012

In order to make it to the gold-medal game at the London 2012 Olympics, American superstar Serena Williams needed to defeat Jelena Jankovic in the opening ground.  Jankovic is a former world #1, currently ranked #18. She has appeared in three grand-slam semifinals matches.

In that same round, so-called “Russian” Maria Sharapova only needed to defeat Shahar Peer.  Peer is currently ranked #58 in the world and has never ranked higher than #13 in her career. Peer has never once in her life been in a grand-slam semi.

This pattern continued throughout the tournament.  Williams then had to defeat current #13 and former world #2 Vera Zvonareva, who has appeared in two grand-slam finals.  Next was former world #1 Caroline Wozniaki, followed by current world #1 Victoria Azarenka, both current top-10 players.

And Sharapova?

Her semi-finals match came against fellow Russian Maria Kirilenko,a player who has never been ranked higher than #20 and who has never once appeared in a grand slam semi-final match, much less a final.  She faced Kim Clijsters, who has won multiple grand slams but who is in the twilight of her career and currently ranked a miserable #36.  And she faced Sabine Lisicki, world #20, with one grand slam semi to her credit, only barely managing to defeat her.

In sum, Williams needed to defeat not one but two of the current top ten players in the world (and three current or former number one players) just to reach the gold-medal match.  Sharapova did not have to face even one  top ten opponent.  In fact, she didn’t have to face a single top 15 player before being given the chance to win a gold medal.  As we have documented since the earliest days of this blog, Sharapova is one of the luckiest human beings ever born to live, and her entire tennis career is based on nothing but dumb luck of exactly this kind.

The results when Sharapova stepped on the court to face Williams were predictable.

Sharapova lost the first nine games in row. She double-faulted on the her first service point and she double-faulted on her first game point. Up to then, she had managed only a woeful 57% first-serve accuracy.  By the time one of the most pathetic and humiliating one-sided final matches in the history of Wimbledon had concluded, Sharapova had seen her vaunted serve broken five times and had won less than half as many points as Williams, a player she has not defeated in eight years.  The match lasted just 63 minutes from start to finish, and Sharapova won only one of 13 games played. Williams won the match on a service ace

Sharapova showed that she did not deserve to be on the same court as Williams.  She showed that her victories over Williams back in 2004 were freak occurrences, as have been all of her grand slam victories.

As we have previously shown, it was a total sham for Russia to have Sharapova carry its flag at the opening ceremonies.  Sharapova is as much of a fraud as a “Russian” as she is as a tennis player, having  lived her entire life in the USA and having learned her game there. Here citizenship of Russia is in name only.  Had Sharapova won the gold medal, she would have taken it back home to the USA, not to Russia.

This brutal defeat of Russia’s flag-bearer at the hands of an American in London is one of the lowest moments in the history of Russian sport. It comes on the heels of America’s thrashing of the Russian female gymnastic team in both the team and all-around competitions, and on the heels of American Michael Phelps dethroning Russian Larissa Latynina as the winningest athlete in the history of the Olympiad.

And to make Russia’s horror complete, Serena then turned around and teamed up with her sister Venus to oust Russians Kirilenko and Nadia Petrova in the doubles semifinal, advancing for a chance at yet more golden glory.

57 responses to “Shame and Disgrace for Sharapova at London 2012

  1. Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

    Et après cette défaite écrasante, la Russie est bel et bien finie. Formidable! Alors, au dodo, petits cons. Süße Träume 😀

    • larussophobe ⋅

      It’s sad that you continue to act just like the goons of the USSR, who also said their state would last forever. It’s apes like you who help to bring Russia endless destruction, by refusing to accept the need for reform.

      • Ma petite: Si la Russie s’écroulera un beau jour, ça n’est probablement pas la faute de Maria Sharapova. Tu devrais deviner l’avenir un peu plus logiquement, je pense.

        • larussophobe ⋅

          More Sovietspeak. Sharapova, a non-Russian, was given the flag by the Kremlin. A mistake. She disgraced Russia with a non-competitive match and was exposed as a Potemkin village, just like her country. Instead of looking for improvement, you look to rationalize failure. As such, you are among Russia’s worst enemies.

          • Secondary Danish Goalkeeper ⋅

            Are you on crack LR? how is participating in a gold medal game an embarrassment by ANY MEANS of that word’s definition??? Embarrassment is when you’re expected to compete in the finals and bow out in 1/8th or don’t even make the playoff stage – THAT’S an embarrassment.

            Also, was reading your ‘Russia failure’ arguments earlier, so can’t say much more about it’s Olympic performance, can you? You seemed to have jumped the gun with claiming that Russia isn’t winning medals. Russia is currently 3rd overall in total count and 4th in golds, with both men and women playing basketball semi finals, men playing volleyball semi finals. So Russia is 1/2 size of America (population wise) and it has more than 1/2 the medals America has. Considering how poor the infrastructure and sports development programs are in Russia, i’d say they’re not doing too bad at all, and better than USA on a pro-rated basis.

            • larussophobe ⋅

              Well, if you were not an illiterate inbred pig you would have understood from the text of this article that (a) SHARAPOVA ONLY GOT TO THE GOLD MEDAL GAME BY DUMB LUCK, she did not have to face any serious opposition, Serena got ALL of it, and (b) WHEN SHE GOT THERE SHARAPOVA PLAYED LIKE A GOAT, losing the first nine games in row. Read a little more and put down the crack pipe before you comment, you’ll look a little less foolish.

              • Secondary Danish Goalkeeper ⋅

                So using your logic Italy are a bad soccer team / lucky soccer nation that did not deserve to win the World Cup in 2006 because they faced: Australia in 1/8th – hardly a soccer nation (and got a made up 95th minute penalty call in their favor at tie score); Ukraine in 1/4th – Ukraine making it to the quarters of the World Cup is an equivalent to a snow leopard making from Egypt to Kenya in a cross Africa race; in semi finals faced a strong German team who got two brutal non-calls in regular time, and only lost due to a lucky bounce in extra time and in the finals once again went to extra time and won as a result of Team France’s Zinedine Zidane red card antics……According to your dumb logic, Team Italy sucks and is an utter disgrace. But wait, you’ll say my example is stupid since Italy has actually WON the tournament, but you and I both know that’s not the point. The point is – they had the easiest route to the finals and pure luck and bounces their way. It’s called SPORTS – STUFF HAPPENS!

                Also, the Guardian did an alternative medal count table based on population and GDP, and Russia scored higher than the United States LOL



                • larussophobe ⋅

                  Yes, strange as it may seem to your puny little mind, if Italy got to the finals by playing ridiculous rivals and then lost in the finals 6-0, we would say they were a pretender, not a good team, and making the finals meant nothing.

                  If you think Sharapova did well by losing the first nine games in a row and winning only one in total, you are deranged.

                  By the way, Russia has ONE of the top FIFTY medal winners at London 2012, the USA has EIGHT of the top ELEVEN. Suck on that, you ridiculous ignorant little troll.

                  PS: We’ve cut the disgusting profanity out of your post, which if you were not a rude, illiterate idiot you would know we do not publish. Next time, we’ll just delete your comment.

                  • Secondary Danish Goalkeeper ⋅

                    What profanity? You’ve insulted me 10 times in 2 posts. But I get it, it’s your blog. You can do whatever you want, but everyone else has to play by the rules. Go on with your big bad self.

                    So what that Italy won the WC? They were still a pretender, and had unbelievable luck and calls and opponent draws going their way. They only won on penalty kicks (not a fair way to win) because Zidane was dumb enough to get red carded and headbutt Materazzi. This is all using your logic. Using normal people’s logic, both, Italy and Sharapova got to the finals, albeit the easy way, they still got there. It’s called sports, and sometimes calls go your way and stronger teams/individuals do not necessarily get to the end and end up crashing somewhere on the way. Am I defending Sharapova by implying that she’s a top tennis player? Hell no. It’s evident and obvious to EVERYONE that she isn’t as good as the Williams sisters and never was. Some of the Russian players you mentioned in your article are better than Sharapova and are one of the top in the world.

                    And what the hell does “8 out of top 11” mean? Care to explain that to my puny little mind?

                  • Secondary Danish Goalkeeper ⋅

                    Need I give you the example of a weaker team going to the gold medal game: US women soccer team against Canada. The US team had ZERO business being in the finals, when the incompetent (admitted by most people who know anything about soccer) Norwegian ref pretty much pulled the Americans through and sunk Canada when Canada was clearly the bigger, and better team.

                  • Rare_F5_Twister ⋅

                    Define top medal winners, please. A they ranked by a number of gold medals won by a single individual, or by significance of a sport, or what?

                    • larussophobe ⋅

                      Top medal winners means the athletes who won the most medals, first gold then silver then bronze. You can see them ranked here:


                      American Michael Phelps won more medals than any other athlete at the games, six, four gold and two silver. So he’s #1. The USA now has the top three and seven of the top ten. Russia has zero of the top 10 and four of the top 50.

                      You’re welcome!

                  • Secondary Danish Goalkeeper ⋅

                    So what you’re saying is…..Americas has more athletes that won multiple medals than Russia and somehow presenting that as a GOOD thing…

                    So are you saying that, let’s take 10 athletes winning 80% of country’s medals is better than 50 athletes winning 100% of country’s medals?

                    8 out of top 11 means that out of US’s 80 medals or whatever they have, those 8 won a solid majority of them, where as out of Russia’s 60 medals or whatever, they were won by 50 or 60 different athletes. If anything, that highlights that Russia doesn’t put all it’s eggs in one basket and dominates across the board, where as Americans rely on superstars like Phelps and others to get them multiple medals.

                    Again, using your logic lol

                    • larussophobe ⋅

                      You’re babbling psychotic nonsense. Please put down the crack pipe.

                      Your suggestion that Russia doesn’t WANT to have Michael Phelps is hysterically funny, though! Tell us another one, funny little man!!

                      The USA has nearly as many GOLD medals as Russia has gold AND silver COMBINED. Russia’s gold medal count is falling, it is now nearly HALF what it was ten years ago, while the US has many MORE medals this year than it had four years ago in Beijing.

                      The USA has GREAT, thrilling athletes in major glamour sports while Russia has weak, boring athletes in sports nobody cares about. That is what we are saying, which you would know if you could read. And the USA has many medals, while Russia has few.

  2. Rare_F5_Twister ⋅

    Jesus. I can’t watch that. Sharapova’s screeching ang moaning is kiling me.

    • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

      You shouldn’t have any problems with somebody screeching and moaning, Rare_ F5_Twister. I mean: Isn’t that sort of the, ahem, “charm” of this very blog?

      • larussophobe ⋅

        If you knew even a little bit about tennis, you’d know that the whole tennis-watching world despises Sharapova’s screeching. Your total inability to defend her play or her behavior, attempting instead to attack this blog, is utterly pathetic and characteristic of the depths to which Russia has fallen.

      • Ah, c’est donc “la communauté internationale” qui te l’a averti — comment ne m’en suis-je pas rendu compte, moi? Alors, pauvre Russie qui persiste de ne se pas laisser persuader par Mme Kim, cette FORMIDABLE porte-parole de l’Occident.

        • larussophobe ⋅

          Your cowardice in refusing to address the point is plain for all to see, no matter what language you babble in.

        • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

          It’s not cowardice, darling — it’s just refined amusement at the expense of a “menopausal loon” to use Reith’s remarkably apt expression of June 10th. Moreover, in case you don’t like French, stop strutting around with a French nick.

      • Bohdan ⋅

        Manturd (i.e. scheissekopf) Limppenis

        Boy, O’ boy do you rave on, ahem, pure scheisse may I add! especially about the ‘ “charm” of this blog?’ which really and purely happens to be you and your comrade ‘cockroach turd’, ahem, you brainless and brainwashed communist imbeciles.

        I wont embarrass you by asking you to say anything intelligent, as that is a physical impossibility for you – ahem! So you are safe in that regard!

        Instead tell us again how wonderful your paymaster, comrade Pootin (poo = scheisse) is, or what a hell hole the average Russian peasant lives in while the powers to be keep on ripping billions off them to feather their own golden nests. Aye, aye comrade do tell, as I’m all ears – and I expect the propaganda to be unreal, as per your usual trashy flotsam.

      • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

        Pshek/Ukro psychobabble at its wittiest, as usual.

        Here comes a multiple-choice question, for a change. Please select one (1) of the answers.

        Q: Why are Bogdan/Bohdan so enthusiastic about tossing around the word “braindead” ?

        A1: Because Psheks and Ukros correctly argue that by suggesting you could be regarded as even sillier than they themselves, your intelligence has REALLY been called into question.

        A2: Not enthusiasm really. “Braindead” has been singled out as a crucial word specifically for Psheks and Ukros taking English classes; this for a reason, arguably.

        A3: Because whenever Psheks and Ukros feel “betrayed” and “sold out” to Russia, it’s a most heartening consolation to them to imagine the traitor was suffering from brain damage.

        There you go 😀

        • Bohdan ⋅

          Thanks birdbrain commo, for proving what an imbecile you really are. Back to Lenin’s brainwashing propaganda learning by rote for you. Which by the way, i.e you learning anything normal is an impossible task in itself.

          But then what’s that saying its impossible to teach communist idiots anything of value.

          Like I’ve always said “show me a communist and I’ll show you an idiot,” comrade birdbrain! So try to live with this fact, you piece of useless communist garbage!!!

  3. Garnet ⋅

    Russian man throws a grenade in response for being rebuked for drinking way too much booze. Five injured.

    A *grenade*.

  4. Après le Tausendjähriges 3D Reich national-socialiste à Manfred , sa pôvre Russie Soviétique Éternelle, F-Raide s’accroche à Poutine Stalinovich qui retient la Sibérie pour les Chinetoques conquérants…les minables Russes en sont réduits à ces bouffons ridicules, comme Manfred, Vlad Poutine et la minable Sharapova pour défendre leur “honneur” NON EXISTANT!

    Le côté des éternels perdants, quoi!

    Mange donc une “poutine”, Manfred, tu vas te sentir mieux!

  5. Beetlejuice ⋅

    Well, all that matters now is that Sharapova is with Kim’s ex-husband. And Kim’s left alone with her rage and anger at anyone born Russian. Poor Kim.

    • Garnet ⋅

      Very funny.

      Ignorance is what moves people like you to try and make fun out of russian atrocities.

      • Beetlejuice ⋅

        You got that right, kid. This blog is filled with nothing but ignorance, as are you. This topic is about SPORTS. Unbelievable.

    • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

      Let’s sing for Kim’s much needed consolation:

      Are you lonesome tonight
      Sharapova’s your plight
      Snatched your husband away just like that
      Now you’re moaning with rage
      Like an ape in a cage
      And have grown undescribably fat

      Throwing tantrums at Russia and Putin won’t do
      Since they’re not too concerned with a nutjob like you

      Lighten up Kim and sing
      You have friends here like Ming
      If he’s handsome, forgive everything



      • larussophobe ⋅

        In Soviet times, there was a joke about Russia: “An American walks up to the front desk of his hotel in Moscow. He complains that he has received the worst services of any hotel he has ever visited in his entire life, from lack of toilet papers to rude chambermaids. The manager at the front desk responds: ‘Yes, but you lynch blacks.'” Your inability to acknowledge Russia’s faults and demand reform helps Russia to continue down the same path to failure that was followed by the USSR, a nation that now lies on the ash heap of history.

      • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

        Sorry, Mam: My language skills have ALSO given me the ability to interpret 100% correctly the weasel words of the bourgeoisie in general with the senile, demented Western petty bourgeoisie slavishly parroting them in particular. Most notably today, with the ruling Western cabal in total disarray as its Empire crumbles, nostrums such as “Russia’s faults” and “demand reform” are so hilariously stupid that it borders on becoming touchingly naïve.

        • Bohdan ⋅

          Aah naughty, naughty Manturd ScheisseKopf, it’s very obvious that you are not taking your psychiatric medications again.

          Be good comrade and go back on them immediately. Then have a good nights sleep so that the medication will work its therapeutic sedation effect.

          You will then feel better and it will also stop your irrelevant rantings and ravings, all pure nonsense, about how good you think you are.

  6. Lire la langue de bois à mon F-Raide est comme examiner une momie Égyptienne…fascinant…de bêtise!

  7. mingthemerciless ⋅

    “the weasel words of the bourgeoisie in general with the senile, demented Western petty bourgeoisie slavishly parroting them in particular.”

    I was trying to use google bing translator but they dont have “Newspeak” listed…mind telling us what creole bolshevik pidgin speaking in tongues this is related to?

    Or are you just jawing out mindlessly like a junkyard dog?

    • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

      Never mind, Ming. Unless you’re a Pshek or a Ukro, I sincerely suggest that you try to solve the mathematical problem which I posted here the other day. Give us a glimpse of how merciless you are, for once.



    • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

      EXTRA EXERCISE (Psheks and Ukros not expected to try it): A right-angled triangle the hypotenuse of which equals 10 length units comprises a square whose side equals 3 length units. Hence, one of the square’s diagonals starts in the right-angled corner of the triangle (as an angle bisector) and ends on its hypotenuse. Calculate the two other sides in the triangle.

      • Bohdan ⋅

        That question of yours, proves beyond a reasonable doubt again/ad mauseam just what a simpleton idiot you are. Your wording comrade ‘swede’ buffoon is woefully lacking in proper English context. Stick to Russian, comrade!!!

        The answer to your jumbled English was realized as soon as I deciphered what you were trying to say unsuccessfully in normal English terminology.

        So comrade Turd brain, the figures are 6 and 8!!! A thing that I learned in Maths class in year 1, when I started my first year of High School.

        Bah what a wasted space you are comrade. Pack up and emigrate to your beloved Pootinland, Swedish turd – because if you are an average benchmark of a communist! then no wonder Pootin’s communist ruSSia is in such a big, big? nay ‘huge’ mess.

      • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

        I’m glad you took the advice within parentheses seriously, Bohdan. Good boy. And to add insult to injuty, you submitted — all by yourself — an almost heavenly beautiful proof positive of my dearest prejudices about you too: Substituting a 100% nonsensical, arrogant diatribe about my English for an honest attempt to solve the problem. Russians, by contrast, are incredibly skilled in mathematics. Deranged psychobabble is for Psheks and Ukros; agreed?

        • Bohdan ⋅

          Listen, comrade ManTurd, the daddy deranged psychobabble imbecile of all time is YOU! got it, you brain dead baboon. And whether you agree or not makes no difference, as you were born an idiot and you will die one. Agreed?

      • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

        Consolation Exercise for Psheks and Ukros:

        Draw to scale a right angled triangle whose side lengths equal 6, 8, and 10 length units respectively. If a square is squeezed into the triangle as outlined in previous exercise — will the square’s side length equal 3 length units?

        • Bohdan ⋅

          Listen comrade commissar ManTurd! you dumb jerk. In any right angled triangle, the hypotenuse of which is 10 units, must by mathematical calculations result in the two sides adjacent to the right angle in being 6 and 8 units respectively. Yes or no?

          Your mathematical English is woeful, badly woeful at the best of times. As you talk of a square – which has four sides. And then you waffle on about a triangle which has three sides.

          I suspect that this is a figment of your warped imagination comrade commissar. Agreed

          • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

            Psheks and Ukros clearly have, as was to be expected, a very poor command of maths and science. Holodomor and Katyn drivel are more suited to them, no doubt.

      • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

        More Maths For Psheks And Ukros


        “In any right angled triangle, the hypotenuse of which is 10 units, must by mathematical calculations result in the two sides adjacent to the right angle in being 6 and 8 units respectively.”


        If the above numbers are subjected to normalization — to wit (1 , 0.6 , 0.8) — then it follows from Bohdan’s Lemma that the absolute values of the sine and cosine functions may only take on the values 0.6 and 0.8 interchangeably.

        Bohdan, mon petit: You’re goddamn revolutionizing trigonometrics by leaps and bounds! Hats off from Manfred 🙂

        • Bohdan ⋅

          ManTurds DILEMMA,

          Hows about telling us instead how it’s impossible to change the facts when Manturd is a complete imbecile! Do you realize just how ridiculous your hair brained ravings are. No! obviously not.

          Face the music, turdbrain, you are one hell of an advert for the idiocy that is communism. Hint jerk! get off the somogonka before you totally pickle what’s left of that little piece of your pea brain that remains and you become a total idiot. Hard to believe, but anythings possible in your instance.

          You comrade commissar are a classic example of the idiots that makeup and believe in that lying, useless and murderous mince grinder that is communism. But then come to think of it you are ex STASI! right Herr ScheisseKopf!

          • Bohdan ⋅

            I cannot but help and notice how you keep on raving ad nauseam about the Ukrainian HOLODOMOR (10 million innocent children, women, and men) by artificial starvation and the KATYN Forest massacre of (22,000 Polish military Officers, Lecturers, Teachers and Intelligentsia) by a pistol shot to the back of the head by the greatest sadistic murder machine in history, the USSR’s secret police – called the NKVD – on the explicit orders of that mass murderer, Secretary J. Stalin. You know your beloved hero!

            Instead comrade commissar, why don’t you rave on about ‘Soso’ Stalin’s NKVD butchers, who outdid Hitler in all slaughter departments. And while on the subject, why don’t you tell us where your parents fit in this cycle, as the Soviets (victims in the 10’s of millions) made the Nazis (victims never even reached the 10 million mark) look like babe’s in the woods in this murderous extermination process.

            And you are proud of this murderous communist machine? Only goes to prove what a brainless idiot you, or any communist for that matter, are!!!

        • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

          Q: How does a Pshek or a Ukro pass an examination?

          A: By raging and fuming at the examiner whenever a question/exercise becomes too difficult. Works just fine in these two God-forsaken “countries” obviously.

          Ergo: Russia should incorporate them without further delay. Civilization to Psheks and Ukros.

          • Bohdan ⋅

            You ManTurd ScheisseKopf are so full of scheisse, that it’s unbelievable. You must be the dregs of Sweden’s untermensch society. No wonder the Stasi became a redundant has been, having you in it was a big mistake as only a bigger idiot then you would believe the trash you come up with.

            Finally, be good enough to tell me? Do you often talk to yourself with these “Questions” and “Answers” times? Naughty, naughty comrade as nuts can talk to themselves – no problem. But when you get the answers to these questions from the same source as, in this case, yourself, that comrade is the first sigh of creeping madness.

            Never mind, go back immediately to taking your skipped doses of psychiatric medicines. Then sleep them off, and tomorrow you will feel better, a little dopey on account of the drugs, but nevertheless harmless.

            • Bohdan ⋅

              As an after thought comrade? Was by any chance your beloved mother, that communist bitch, Alexandra Kollontai, “Commissar of Guardianship” who believed “every form of sexual relationship was acceptable.” (Russia under the Bolshevik Regime, 1919-1924 – by Richard Pipes) page 332.

              When in 1923 Stalin, sent her “to Norway, then to Mexico, and ultimately to (surprise, surprise) Sweden to serve as ambassador – the first women in history, it was said, to head a diplomatic mission. It seems to have gratified Stalin’s ribald sense of humor to have the apostle of free love represent him in the country of free love.” page 457.

              I bet she was? aye, comrade! and I also bet you don’t even know your father. Am I right again, comrade? Go on spill your guts chum, to father confessor me. You can trust me when I say that I will tell no one. To use your terminology “hahaha.”

          • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

            I admire your writing skills — they are truly outstanding with one word out of four being an invective, on average. Way to go, Bohdan.

            • Bohdan ⋅

              What Manturd ScheisseKopf? My “one word out of four being an invective, on average.” Comrade you are lying again, oops I mean still, and you obviously cannot count correctly either.

              When I describe a little worthless scum of a worm like you, I state the truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. Your trouble is that you don’t like the truth being said about you.

              For your information chum, it is you (and especially that foul mouthed russophobe Ozark Mountains Redneck – “Cockroach Shyte” i.e.beetlejuice) that started to dish this invective language out in the first instance. And so I am only dishing out what you deserve. Or as the late U.S. President Harry Truman said “If you cant stand the heat in the kitchen, get out!”

              • Bohdan ⋅

                In case you have problems in deciphering or understanding what I have said or meant? It is, you be civil in your articles, and I too will be civil in return.

                And finally, if you don’t like what L.R. writes about your “beloved, but extremely murderous and corrupt Pootin and his cohorts in present day KGB controlled Russia!” in her excellently researched articles then I suggest that you instead ‘surf’ the likes of Russia Today or Pravda – which are, I’m positive, more to your tastes. But if you do want to reply to any of L.R.s articles do it in a professional manner, as befitting a free thinking society, where intelligent and sane though is always welcome.

                By L.R.s rights we both have the privilege to disagree. That is the beauty of freedom of expression! So if you keep it civil, without the unnecessary insults to L.R. or anyone else; I for one will certainly keep it civil too.

      • Manfred Steifschwanz ⋅

        Keep up your fabulous work in the field of trigonometrics, my precious little Ukro — your contributions make the Russians look very dull indeed; Maria Sharapova no exception.

        By the way, Bohdan: Is it true as they say that the libretto of Carmen is sung like this over in Ukraine?

        Holodomor, en garde
        Holodomor, Holodomor
        Et songe bien, oui, songe en combattant
        Que Staline te regarde
        Et que Goulag t’attend, Holodomor
        L’amour, l’amour t’attend

        • Bohdan ⋅

          Thank you for cementing what I’ve always believed about a leopard not changing its spots.

          Listen Comrade Commissar! this is an English language blog and hence I don’t waste my good time in Google translating – like you do. Besides even L.R. has pointed out to you on more then one occasion that this is an English language blog. You want to waffle on, through Google translate no doubt, do so on your beloved RT or Pravda trash rags. Where you will find like minded communist simpletons and all kinds of lies, but definitely no truth, whatsoever.

          Or as they say in Swedish, courtesy of Google translate, “hej då!, på återseende.” Or as they say in Aussie parlance “Kyss min åsna!”

          P.S. Next time you visit your mother’s, i.e. Aleksandra Kollontai, grave do send my belated regards by relieving yourself on it. Trust me it will make the weeds growing on it much greener.

  8. mingthemerciless ⋅

    Mon Fred Lemou sez:
    “Draw to scale a right angled triangle”

    Have a swig of unobtainium, mon dear Fred:

    Following several years of work, Mon cher Fred Lemou has decided to invest in an undisclosed company’s new electric car. Using new technology, including the first use of unobtainium isotope UN239 in a battery module, the new company expects the car to achieve 93mpg on the highway on a single charge. Additional benefits of the new technology include a reduction in weight due to the elimination of all external and internal lighting. A spokesperson said, “…the car practically glows in the dark. Actually, it does glow in the dark.”

  9. Dmitry


    Finally I see an American woman as charismatic and beautiful as Sharapova!

Talk back to La Russophobe

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s